by Wolfshanze
dbolyard wrote:
I almost didn't bother coming to this thread as I figured someone surely would have answered simply...
YES
Thank you for being frank Steven.
Nothing in the English rules as written (English 1st ed.) excludes scoring a second triplet. The rules elaborate on how to score numbers rolled, and the only restriction to scoring a particular number is that you must have at least 3 of a kind. I disagree that the rules support the argument that ONLY one set of numbers can score on a turn...at all. This is definitely being read into the text. No need to house rule nor complicate things here. 3 of a kind is 3 of a kind.
YES
Thank you for being frank Steven.
Nothing in the English rules as written (English 1st ed.) excludes scoring a second triplet. The rules elaborate on how to score numbers rolled, and the only restriction to scoring a particular number is that you must have at least 3 of a kind. I disagree that the rules support the argument that ONLY one set of numbers can score on a turn...at all. This is definitely being read into the text. No need to house rule nor complicate things here. 3 of a kind is 3 of a kind.
TY all for the answers... and yes, I almost overthought this since it never mentioned anything about having two 3-of-a-kinds in the rules... I find it odd as much detail as it goes into scoring that this possibility is not addressed, even in the 2nd edition rules that were supposed to clarify questions about the rules.