by Scorpion0x17
ras2124 wrote:
FAQs and clarifications often reword or change rules slightly to explain the original intention. Do you really think an official clarification that contradicts the original rules (not even the expansion rules that the card in question is from) is somehow not official?
No, but FAQs and clarifications generally clear up logical inconsistencies, rather than introducing them.
Stephan's statement introduces a logical inconsistency that did not previously exist.
If one takes the rules as they are published there is no inconsistency and no need for an FAQ or clarification.