by bakija
Clevider wrote:
Is this a belief based on evidence? I skimmed my 1st Edition rule book and didn't find anything supporting one interpretation over the other. As far as I can tell, it comes down to a house rule at this point.
Thee doesn't need to be anything other than the rules as written and math.
If you roll 3x3 you get 3 points. If you roll 3x3 and also 3x3, you get 6 points either way you want to look at it (3x3 for 3 and then 3 for 3 extra 3's; or 3x3 for 3 twice), so it doesn't matter.
In any other situation, counting the extra numbers for +1 each is superior to counting them as another set of 3 (i.e. if you roll 6x2's, you get 2 points for rolling 3x2, and then 3 more points for 3 extra 2's, which is 5 points, instead of 4 points for 3x2 twice).
If you roll 3x3 and 3x2? that is 3 and 2 points for 5.
There is nothing to interpret here.