by jimmcmahon
Action Phase wrote:
I didn't notice my punctuation (outside the quotations, which was intentional--context, anyone?). Then again, there seems to be a difference in a thread posted on my lunch vs. publishing a revised booklet for a game, right?
You seem to be missing the point: I am not a game publisher putting out a 2nd printing of a popular game. The onus should be on the publisher to ensure things like referencing your own game components by the correct name. My thread was never intended to be spiteful. But the question remains: was yours? The only point I can you trying to make is that I also am not perfect... which has nothing to do with the point of the thread: the King is called "Kong."
Drawing attention to something, phrasing it as question to others, and heckling are not the same thing. What was important to me, what motivated me to post this in the first place, was to illuminate this for future edits. Granted, I could have conveyed this directly to eh publisher outside of a public forum. Please take into account that:
1.) I gave the game accolades
2.) I gave plausible excuse(s) based on language barrier
3.) I even said all but the "Kong" issue were marginal (more of a pet peeve).
What more can I say? If you want satisfaction, buy a Snickers. Or troll some more. Either way, bro bro bro.
You seem to be missing the point: I am not a game publisher putting out a 2nd printing of a popular game. The onus should be on the publisher to ensure things like referencing your own game components by the correct name. My thread was never intended to be spiteful. But the question remains: was yours? The only point I can you trying to make is that I also am not perfect... which has nothing to do with the point of the thread: the King is called "Kong."
Drawing attention to something, phrasing it as question to others, and heckling are not the same thing. What was important to me, what motivated me to post this in the first place, was to illuminate this for future edits. Granted, I could have conveyed this directly to eh publisher outside of a public forum. Please take into account that:
1.) I gave the game accolades
2.) I gave plausible excuse(s) based on language barrier
3.) I even said all but the "Kong" issue were marginal (more of a pet peeve).
What more can I say? If you want satisfaction, buy a Snickers. Or troll some more. Either way, bro bro bro.
I'm not trolling. I have no disputes with any of the points that you have made, which I am also not missing. I agree with everything you've been saying.
I found it amusing that there were some grammatical errors in a post posting about grammatical errors. I pointed it out. If I were to have made the same kinds of mistakes, I would hope someone would point them out to me, as it is feedback. Feedback is never good or bad, it is simply feedback. I take it for what it is worth.
However, I have tried to not be condescending at all, which I personally find things like the "bro bro" and the "bro bro bro" to be. I apologize if what I posted originally seemed to be an attempt to "knock off your hat," for it wasn't intended to be as big a thing as you appear to have taken it to be. I shall now "move along," as you directed me to do earlier.